Dr. Sykes Has A "Nemesis"? Is The Yeti Causing A New Cold War?


New Yeti evidence has surfaced just outside of Moscow, which is getting some media attention. The real story brewing however, seems to be about the disagreements between the prominent Russian Yeti researchers, and Dr. Bryan Sykes. In the recent Yeti DNA study conducted by Sykes, he concluded that the DNA turned out to be a type of bear that was thought to be extinct. Other samples tested turned out to be known animals. The Russians however, disagree with these findings.

Russia's yeti-hunters have not only allies abroad, but also those who argue against the Almas' existence.

Professor Bryan Sykes, a 67-year-old geneticist and fellow of Wolford College, Oxford, has written his own book debunking some purported evidence of the creature's existence. Sykes previously helped identify the bones of the last of the Romanovs, Russia's royal family murdered by the Bolsheviks in 1918. Now, in "The Yeti Enigma," due out in September, he draws on the same expertise to look at alleged yeti evidence. He claims that all the 39 supposed yeti hairs and teeth samples that he tested came from ordinary animals. Sykes has also suggested that the Himalayan yeti is a species of polar bear.

Last October, Burtsev took on his nemesis in a TV series called "The Bigfoot Files" broadcast by the U.K.'s Channel 4.

The two men also clashed over a skull in Burtsev's possession believed to have belonged to the son of a "wild woman" who had been held in captivity in Mongolia 150 years ago. After testing some samples, Sykes hypothesised that she might have been a black African slave, or a descendant of a group of people who migrated to Mongolia from Africa thousands of years ago. Burtsev insists that the skull's shape is not that of an ordinary human.

Michael Trachtengerts, a colleague of Burtsev who also featured in the program, remains unswayed by Sykes' arguments against the existence of the yeti.

"The samples he tested were doubtful," he says over a recent lunch in a Moscow cafe. "Hairs from Siberia were identified as belonging to a North American brown bear! How is that possible?"

To find out what evidence was discovered outside of Moscow, read the rest of the article here.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Big V P Queercules "J",, is a yearnin an a churnin an a thirstin fer some DNA of the
      "Caulk" kind!!! What say ya'll
      Youze Flo Rida Gulpin Guzzards????

      Delete
  2. We cannot rely on plausible scientific methods (like those conducted by Sykes) to determine the existence of the elusive yeti or bigfoot. One must absorb the bolshevik vomited forward by the likes of Ketchum and Burstev. They are the truthful ones. Mind-speak, bigfoot hoo-ha and Zana the almasty woman-kids are real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its a crazy hobby.

      Fascinating to watch.

      Delete
    2. Science is a big boys club for crusty old perverts who get paid well for regurgitating the status quo, and outcast for hinting anything otherwise.
      Stay asleep in your little safe box of ignorance, it looks like a thrilling little place :)

      Delete
  3. That's footery for you.

    When a top dna expert says no monkey they say nope your wrong.

    Crazy hobby.

    Oh and Joe got smoked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ wrong...top dna expert doesn`t say monkey...he says bear.

      Delete
  4. Roger put a pair of comedy breasts on his bigfoot costume to troll these idiots. 47 years later and he is still trolling the sh*t out of the likes of Joe and sweaty yeti.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps he is also responsible for Kit having a breakdown and pretending to be a special agent after he couldn't disprove the PGF.

      Packham still bears the scars of this film today.

      He won't talk about it. It almost finished him.

      MMG

      Delete
  5. Is Bigfoot real, and if not, why do people still believe? Bigfoot most likely does not exist according to all available modern scientific evidence. All logic points to the fact that if Bigfoot were real, someone would have found definitive proof by now. Yet despite all evidence pointing to the contrary, there are still those out there who will swear that they have seen the mythical creature. Maybe they even believe what they are telling others, or maybe they are simply trying to get their 15 minutes of fame. Regardless of their reasoning, the underlying cause for believing in Bigfoot is the same: it fulfills a basic human need to seek out a purpose that makes them feel as if they are a part of something unique and special.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. people will believe in what they experience...you have clearly had little experience in life and therefore believe nothing but what you are told by others

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. The sheer frequency of reliable and professional eyewitnesses is what proves the statement up top has as much weight in truth as these folks' so called credentials to oppose those who have excelled them in respected fields... Fields that are relevant to wildlife biology and anthropology and who don't require lowering themselves to a level of a scoffing blog in which insults and cynicism is the brunt of output to make up for a lack of achievement in their unrecognised existences. There is a sense of community to be attained in identifying a target, like the Nazi's did in the 1930's. I see absolutely no difference in the quality of approach from these people than the average uneducated, unqualified individuals that feel the need to troll discussion blogs for perverse reassurance purposes. There are food resources, there is space and there are the clues left behind that state that there is not one argument that can't be countered with another, to which in turn highlights at the very least something that is going on.

      Considering that every single source of evidence exists short of type specimen, is it healthy to maintain the tunnel vision, denialist's stance that there is nothing what so ever to the claims of an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the US?

      It's simple, most people like 5:23 are ignorant of the facts and celebrate their own ignorance to attain a sense of community. In sheer nativity of the facts regarding evidence, it's easy to come across so confident, but it only lasts as long as someone can point out these facts to which it then turns into aggressive denial, because they've sounded off so much, for so long.

      Ego's require preserving.

      Delete
  6. I also think a lot of people have worn weary of the lousy offerings lately. The evidence showing up is getting worse and worse, little effort put into the hoaxes, and it's getting pretty boring. When all you have is a bunch of really, seriously stupid TV shows like (Never) Finding Bigfoot, Mountain Monsters and so on, where they've had to start actually faking their evidence for entertainment purposes, people just give up. It really has become a kind of joke...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ maybe you`re right ..but it runs parallel with the mainstream of lies,deceit and outright hokum that is presented as "news"...all the mainstream stories are equally as concocted and falsified as anything in the bigfoot world...the only difference being that the bigfoot world hurts less people with its shite.

      Delete
    2. ^^ you obviously do a lot of "thinking" huh ? ...or mental "rubbing".

      Delete
  7. If Figboot really existed, then with the proliferation and improvements in operational simplicity of mass market handycams and digital cameras since the PG film, we would surely have expected a dramatic improvement in both the quantity and quality of Figboot movies. These days, anyone who has a smartphone has a digital/video camera with them at all times.

    I can't find it now, but some time ago I read an article (with a graph) that implied a correlation between the global growth of camera/smartphone distribution and the global reduction in UFO sightings. I think the same thing is happening with Figboot.

    IMO, there hasn't been a really "good" fake since the PG film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Incorrect lady man. Ol' Figboot is going to prove his existence by jamming his fully engulfed cock right into your left ear and then up in to you ars.

      Delete
    2. When you're confronted with something in the range of ten feet tall, 1000lbs, in a wilderness area, the last thing you're gonna be thinking is getting your camera out. You're gonna want to get out of there as safely and as smoothly as possible. Also, the flip side of that is they move too fast, leaving you with a blobsquatch.

      Delete
  8. Well, if bigfoot was made "real" by Patterson's exclusive film of the monster, and the lack of anything even remotely interesting since that time has made bigfoot less than real, it seems to be a pretty simple and very small leap to conclude that bigfoot will "die" without something more interesting than the standard 21st century fare being served up. Maybe not die out completely, but for all intents and purposes die out as any sort of mainstream interest, and definitely as any sort of seriously considered nonsense.

    For bigfoot to survive the cheap, ludicrous, insane stuff that it has evolved into, something decent has to happen. I fully believe that the PGF was a hoax, of that I have no doubt. And it spawned a huge following and industry, which for a time tried to maintain some level of respectability for the subject. That respectability is now gone. It's a laughable topic now. Bigfoots that hop rides on trains, that can morph into logs and trees, or cloak, or use mental telepathy on people, or keep coyotes or wolves as pets, or run equally well on all fours as they do on two feet. It's become a pathetic mess, with apparently nobody within the club willing to do any housekeeping, to weed out the nonsense and bring back a sense of respectability. None of the top tier personalities seem interested in fixing this problem. They all seem to be more interested in getting their own star on the sidewalk before it all goes under.

    For example, Meldrum is like Teflon; he has one of the most resilient reputations, even though he associates with known hoaxers like Standing and hack researchers like Munns. What he should be doing is ditching Standing and contract with another "researcher" who is less obviously a hoaxer as Standing is. Team up with that respected guy and advertise some new methods of research. Then, ditch the "I can't make a good bigfoot suit" Mr. Munns and get with someone who actually CAN make a good bigfoot suit. Do the AmWay thing, duplicate success. Patterson produced the most enduring bigfoot hoax of all time, and that is the template Meldrum and Team should copy. Come up with footage that rivals Patterson's film, and the whole subject will have an infusion of interest. That ought to stimulate the influx of fresh research grants which can then be squandered on nonsensical projects (hopefully not as blatantly ridiculous as the Munns painted nude ladies thing), a good portion of which would be direct personal income.

    Seems pretty simple to me. Such golden opportunities being passed up by those guys. Instead, we get the white spoof at night. Oh well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You forgot Meldrum's willingness to prostitute himself to anyone with a TV camera even though he's consistently duped by producers into being a talking head on a fake mockumentary. Footery has become a joke recently and week by week the idea of the creature existing gets less plausible. It's a snipe hunt full of crazy characters trying to be a modern Barnum and get their 15 minuites of fame. I think even a deathbed confession from Gimlin won't end the craziness now.

      Delete
    2. Please step away from the keyboard.

      The insane ramblings are a worry but I guess you somehow think that anyone gives a rat's ass about your simplistic, childish trolling.

      Even your JREF buddies are faceplaming at your efforts.

      MMG

      Delete
    3. unlike your words of 100% fact and nobody gives a rats ass about you or your 300lb boy friend t-fats so please go away and stay there

      thank you
      the management

      Delete
    4. 5:29 dealt with here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/a-dried-flower-gift-from-sasquatch.html

      Delete
  9. The ham radio is going crazy! Reports that a trucker has run over the spaghetti monster just this side of Potato Salad State Park.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'The samples are doubtful'

    No sh*t my friend! Despite this Burtsev is still a loose cannon.

    I pass on anything that comes from his direction.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ typical "westernised" mentality...somebody doing things their own way is a "loose cannon"...poke it all up your shitter with your boyfriends dick

      Delete
  11. THIS SITE IS RIDDLED WITH MALWARE AND OTHER SUCH SHITE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    BE WARNED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sykes is a hack with an anti-BF agenda. He has zero credibility with most of us who believe

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story