Do you see a Bigfoot in this photograph?


Do you see a chocolate colored Bigfoot face in this photograph? According to Dr. Melba Ketchum, this still was taken from a video filmed by some Chinese tourist. It's unclear which footage Ketchum is talking about, but Ketchum points out out that the subject's face can clearly be seen. "Chocolate colored face, right side of picture. You can see the face pretty well," says Ketchum.

The face of Bigfoot?


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Once again, it posts like these that pwn Joe. Funny stuff.

      Delete
    2. Well done boyo, you're really showing me lately.

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    3. I will tell you what's "funny stuff" 12:52. Your desperation!

      Delete
    4. no life uno! on 24/7...sucks to be you^^^

      Delete
    5. I think you suck yourself 24/7.

      Delete
    6. wow what a comeback! think that one up all by yourself?

      Delete
    7. ...at least it was more original than yours. ^

      Delete
    8. Joe:

      "Bigfoots were already present in the dinosaur age"

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html

      Definition:

      A hypothetical question is one asked out of interest, as the answer will have no effect on the situation.

      Delete
    11. Is El Chupacabra is a direct lineage to an archaic species of Bipedal Pygmy dinosaurs?//

      #PJquestions

      Delete
    12. "Neanderthals didn't/couldn't breed with homo sapiens."

      #DClogics

      Delete
    13. Grammar pro-tip: quotations are reserved for the use of exact wording.

      It's ok though, they don't teach Language and Grammar at those top British universities, so I can understand and empathize with your poor formatting.

      Delete
    14. Not when I'm quoting you in a nut shell boyo. Oh... And it's a measure of how things have come when the likes of you and the super hero are more interested in my grammar.

      Delete
    15. Even in that situation, quotations are still not proper.

      I wouldn't talk about measuring sticks when there is not a single bigfoot catalogued in history. Opens up a world of daily digression when your headlining story is a Melba Ketchum Paradolia Facebook post...

      Delete
    16. Well, I used it to make you look daft, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it.

      Bigfoot news is Bigfoot news, you chimed in to check it didn't you?

      Plenty found;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU

      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM

      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w

      ... None caught.

      Delete
    17. "plenty found"

      really? three blob video constitutes a "plenty found"?

      Delete
    18. Blobs that defy 47 years worth of SFX and acrobatics, sure.

      Plenty found.

      Delete
    19. Blobs that one shunned costume designer supports but the entire industry that ostracized him 25 years ago say is man in a suit?

      Delete
    20. My word that made me laugh. Man, what exaggerations, he got sacked once in a competitive and opinionated field... You stupid drama queen. Munns, has personally constructed over 20 costumes of varied design and investigated dozens more by other professionals over the course of his career. His costume making methods far exceed anything accomplished in the late 60's, and is therefore qualified to study the allegations.

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      Look at the link, there's pictures if an adult isn't around to help... That's organic tissue.

      Obliterated.

      Delete
    21. OBAMA in 2016
      FOR OUR SAFETY

      Delete
    22. Oh... And very single expert you can think of have passed a lazy on the spot opinion, prior to the footage being stabelized, are simply its proponents.

      Delete
    23. that's not bigfoot- just Joe practicine goatse

      Delete
    24. somtimes tham sitchuwayshun gits yous thinkin thar be a bigfoots in da boosh buts its aints

      Delete
    25. Careful... You don't want to upset Danny, he's trying to forget about 'that incident' you know.

      Delete
    26. He got sacked from a major set in mid-production for failure to make a quality prop. It's actually quite an asterisk on his career and marked his last venture into major production films. That was in the mid-1980s.

      Professionals, legends, peer recognized award winning experts roundly agree that it is a man in a suit.

      Delete
    27. Don McLeod, a Movement specialist, Dan Richter, the actor and coordinator for the Dawn of Man sequence, Ray Harryhausen; none of these have any of the level of undertanding of biological tissue like this person;

      "In conclusion, after a thorough review of the copy of the Patterson-Gimlin film provided to me, it is my professional opinion that it represents a live hominid and not a human in a costume. As noted above, there are multiple details of areas on the filmed individual’s body that correspond to those found in a human. Also as stated above, the replication of some of these anatomic landmarks would be difficult or impossible to accomplish in a costume. Additionally, it would take a detailed knowledge of human anatomy to even be aware of some of these anatomical features, let alone possess the technical skills to incorporate them into a convincing costume. That information is only known to a very select percentage of the population, of which I happen to belong.
      While it may be difficult for one to accept that in our modern age there can be a large, undiscovered hominid living in our forests, the facts have to be faced. In the words of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s famous character, Sherlock Holmes: “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
      -O. Allen Guinn, III, M.D., F.A.C.S. Aurora Plastic Surgery
      Lee’s Summit, MO

      ... I mean, sure they have fame and it's always nice getting someone known to back up your theories, but in truth they have nothing on the expertise of people who have cut up and remodelled human flesh before and have careers to look after.

      Has Stan Winston conducted analysis on the 'suit' or just offered a lazy opinion, just like Rick Baker, Howard Berger, Dave Kindlon?
      Rick Baker - 'rumoured' to have made the costume as he was working on movies at the time, whilst none of his representatives are willing to comment and verify those claims.
      Howard Berger - merely claimed that he heard that the PG film was a 'gag' and has yet to comment on why he thinks it's a suit and compares the PG creature to Harry and the Henderson's as 'proof' it's fake.
      Dave Kindlon - claims he 'overheard' PG was fake from Rick Baker - again, full of claims and rumors and speculates it's fake as opposed to offering any explanation why it's a 'suit'
      Verne Langdon - claims that 'the suit was advanced for the day' (opinionated I believe and again not offering an explanation how the suit was made)

      ... The list of these experts goes on with them all turning out to be close associates and none of them offering an explanation as to how the 'suit' was made... casting their opinion like all lazy uninterested skeptics. Whereas, Bill Munns DOES actually look into the possibility of a suit being made and can't for the life of him replicate it or be able to fit the dimensions of a human in it. All these people offered an opinion on the spot as opposed to thorough analysis that would be suficient to pass judgement on something that has the proportions Patty has.

      "If one of my colleagues created this for a movie, he would be out of business."
      -Stan Winston

      You see... This also just digs a bigger hole, because if someone like Stan can state that the costume could cost a couple of $100, then why couldn't a BBC budget manage it? Why couldn't Blevins manage it?? For someone with as big a rep, he didn't think that one out too thoroughly did he? Well if I someone who had knocked up a monkey suit to best 46 year's worth of advances, I'd hand him a job! Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    28. "Munns was originally hired to transform Stout’s impressive images into working, practical effects, but due to budgetary constraints, along with dissatisfaction from director Dan O’Bannon, Munns was fired halfway through the shoot and replaced by Myers, who was able to pull off minor miracles on a shoestring budget."

      "Munns defends his work on the film by saying that O’Bannon wanted the impossible on no money and that the director was so single-minded in his work that he wasn’t good at working (or relating properly to) others around him."

      "Some of the ghastly publicity stills that adorn the UK soundtrack album sleeve show some of the original zombie make-up work that O’Bannon signed-off on and subsequently changed his mind on the day of the shoot and if these were typical of how things went under Munns’ time on the film, then his dismissal might not have been that rash."

      Well we already know that Munns was on a tight budget, and we already know the relationship between Munns and O'Bannon was frosty. I think there's enough credentials in Munns' CV that shows him very accomplished at make up... Considering we're talking about a magic monkey suit from the 60's here, it's moving the goal posts ever so slightly.

      "Munns was also responsible for the iconic skeleton that rises from the grave, which doesn’t look TOO bad, but when you compare it to what Stout had envisioned, it comes across as distinctly lacklustre."

      Let's see... "Munns was originally hired to transform Stout’s impressive images into working, practical effects, but due to budgetary constraints... "

      "Munns was also working on the headless “Yellow Man” zombie and even shows you a picture of a work-in-progress version which looked pretty laughable..."

      ... Wait for it... "In his defence, Munns was doing what was asked of him and his version of the Tar-Man zombie was pretty much what ended up on -screen, with only a few minor modifications."

      As I suggested earlier; professional biases are always rife in the film business and people get legs up and favoured all the time, not to mention conflict of creative opinion is very common, as I stated earlier. When the legacy of a film is someone getting sacked, there's usually not much sympathy and compassion for he who got the hump. I see nothing in the review up top that doesn't confirm what what I've been saying all along, and we don't hear Munns' side f the story really... Do we? Munns is an expert in constume, his work in comparison to the alleged suit made in 1967 would far exceed any accomplishments and manufacturing skills of a broke cowboy who would have knocked it up in his garage, and you are as daft as ever and agenda driven as ever. I'll finish, that the success of other SFX dudes ain't at the detriment of someone working 30 years in the field or any of he many people working wonders in the field... That's unless said expert makes you all sweaty, and you want to suggest that the only experts in an artistic field are those who've won awards. If that were the case, we'd have but a handful, and that ain't the case.

      Delete
    29. Bill Munns does not have the final say in declaring bigfoot a recognozed species. FYI

      Delete
    30. Nobody, including himself, is stating otherwise.

      FYI

      Delete
    31. Got any real scientists? Ones that aren't profiting by advancing the hoax?

      Delete
    32. Who? Like Jane Goodall, Ian Redmond, Anna Nikaris, Zhoua Guoxing, Lyn Miles, Jeffrey McNeely, Chris Loether, Colin Groves and none other than George Schaller, Esteban Sarmiento, Jeff Meldrum, Jimmy Chilcutt, Bryn Sykes, Paul Fuerst, Henner Fahrenbach & Grover Krantz?

      People like that?

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    33. No one of these scientists has ever declared that Bigfoot is a recognized species.

      You are just a deluded person which makes up lies to convince yourself of your beliefs

      Delete
    34. No... For that they would need a type specimen (duh?), what they do is point to the evidence being there.

      And by the way... This accounts for every source short of modern type specimen.

      Occam's razor.

      Delete
  2. If that counts as "pretty well", then I can see at least two more "pretty well".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simon ese. dats uno PataGrande een da tree.
    I believe een El Beegfut-bal...

    ReplyDelete
  4. 2014 and bigfoot research still consists of people filming the woods and retrospectively looking for faces in the foilage. This pretty much proves bigfoot does not exist. REKT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Coming from someone who sees imaginary zippers, that's rich. I would say you're rhetorical considering the mounds of evidence there is, but you need some level of intelligence to be that calculative.

      PS. Go on Google images to see how difficult it is to spot mountain gorillas in dense brush. This is why people invest time in doing things like this and though I'm not defending pareidolia, the people putting this stuff forward have the comparisons to how well gorillas stay hidden in mind.

      Delete
    2. Your "mounds" of evidence is mostly crap like this. REKT.

      Delete
    3. Did anyone read any of those posts on that 2 days old that? REKT.

      Delete
    4. You did, and took the time to do exactly the same.

      You got schooled son.

      Delete
    5. I wouldn't have even seen them if another kind anon hadn't pointed them out. I went there, saw the large walls of text, did not read a word, facepalmed and left. REKT.

      Delete
    6. One day you'll man up, develop the literary maturity and absorb your annihilation.

      Delete
    7. Annihilated by zero bigfoots and a complete misunderstanding of reality on your part? Yea... Sure man... Annihilated.... Ha ha ha

      Delete
    8. Joe:

      "Bigfoots were already present in the dinosaur age"

      Talking about literary maturity

      Delete
    9. Plenty found;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU

      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM

      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w

      ... None caught.



      http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html

      Definition:

      A hypothetical question is one asked out of interest, as the answer will have no effect on the situation.

      Delete
    10. an hypothetical question is not a completely moronic question.

      the mere fact that you came up with such hypothesis is the sign of your mental disorders

      Delete
    11. what about this hpothetical question:

      "might it be that Bigfoot doesn't exist at all and that alle the supposed and doubtful evidence are in fact nothing just rubbish?"

      now that is a question that makes sense

      Delete
    12. Oh boy, Joe got smoked again

      Delete
    13. 5:09... Actually, my definition is pretty much the standard, no special pleading will cut it. I didn't make the hypothetical scenario up, as the link shows it's an old topic of discussion.

      5:12... Unfortunately for you, the evidence points to the contrary and no special pleading will cut it.

      5:15... http://www.smokeyjoesauces.co.uk/

      Delete
    14. He will learn literary maturity as soon as you learn literary brevity.

      Delete
    15. Go make a complaint about it Danny, remember when you pouted with the admins for not banning me and stole avatars? What was your 'blog' called again??

      Delete
    16. ?

      Complain to the admins that you can't make a concise post? Seems like abuse of the reporting system...

      Delete
    17. Nothing you haven't boo-hoo'd about before.

      Delete
    18. Sykes is coming! Vroom, Joe, vroom.

      Delete
    19. And he certainly still might considering he's still testing samples & with a hybrid study... Keep praying he doesn't.

      Delete
    20. tham mexicuns eatin ats tham Dennys thay shure is

      Delete
    21. I have talked to Dr. Sykes, through his familiar, Rhettman Mullet, and he has assured me that Dr. Sykes will continue his zealous quest for bigfoot DNA immediately upon his return to Hogwarts.

      Delete
    22. mexicuns caws thays bein takin tham jobs

      Delete
  5. now that is what a bigfoot really looks like not that i've ever seen one but by the Patterson film

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well this one does look like a face, but being in foliage and taken with auto focus does not yield spectacular results. Just ask MIKE.

    HEY JOE. I see my Detroit Lions are coming to your island for a game against the Atlanta Falcons next Sunday.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Chuck!! I'll keep an eye out for that... I know next to nothing about American Football, but I'll be sure to check it out!

      Delete
    2. It's not like rugby Joe, they need pads so they don't get hurt

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Well if you lived over here you would and would like it a lot. I suppose if I lived over there I would be a soccer/football fan.
      Chuck

      Delete
    4. Here you go Joe. The greatest runner. Ever

      http://youtu.be/tmxpANukJsU

      MMC

      Delete
    5. Hello MMC. Game has got so fast and hard hitting pads are not enough to prevent the wealth of injuries that occur. I have designed a new football suit that would eliminate about 90 percent of all injuries. Whole suit would be built of nerf and players would all look like the Michelin Man. Roger Goodall had not called me back as yet.
      Chuck

      Delete
    6. Need to work up a promotional video. Generous use of vasoline and lots of trick editing

      MMC

      Delete
    7. Jeeeeeez MMC!! That guy can shift!!

      Chuck... Agreed on the sports, American football is getting massive out here and every time I've watched it I've been left thinking "wow"!!! I think the complex tactics is what puts a lot of people off in the UK, British football being much more straight forward and easier for hooligans to understand!

      Delete
    8. Jeepers JOE. I got a good laugh over this. Hooligans in this country are Oakland Raider fans. To the newbie or casual observer American Football does seem complex. The strategy is simple. 11 guys trying to move the football by run or pass against 11 guys trying to stop. It is the myraid of formations used, motion shifts and plays called of these that are complex. These continually evolve.

      I did not realize that American Football is getting bigger over on the European Continent. I just assumed it was nothing more than an NFL pr ploy, but maybe there is a long term plan.
      Chuck

      Delete
    9. He only had a couple solid hits on him in his whole career. The problem Joe with these highlight reals is that they don't show the broken plays where he was running in circles avoiding everybody. There were guys that had two or three shots at him but could not touch him

      He is a very smart man. I bleev he owns a bank now

      MMC

      Delete
    10. HEY MMC. I figured the paste was about Barry Sanders. Barry was a freak of nature. No one ever ran and shifted like him before and probably no one ever will again although never is a long time. Just glad he wore the Honolulu Blue and Silver
      Thanks MMC
      Chuck

      Delete
    11. The helmet and pads cause a false sense of safety that leads to reckless abandon. The hits are much harder because of the pads, you don't have to have constant worry of inflicting injuries to yourself and others on your mind like a tackle or scrum in rugby, or a hard penalty/mistimed slide tackle in soccer.

      One look at the rate of long term negative health aspects comparatively shows this.

      Chuck, brush up on the London games and Euro expansion of the NFL. Apparently you missed that memo some time ago.

      Delete
    12. Yes chuck

      Never in the history of American football did everybody hope for a "broken" play. With Barry a beoken play just meant that you had to try to find Barry. Good luck with that !

      I am so glad that Green Bay let him go

      THANK YOU PACKERS!!!

      MMC

      Delete
    13. British football does get this type of injury though;

      https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=compound+fracture+in+football&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=923&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=nv9EVISGL-OAsQTY8YJw&ved=0CCAQsAQ

      Delete
    14. Oh... And this Sanders chap sounds like me playing rugby back in the day!

      ; )

      Delete
    15. I love rugby Joe. They carry it often on one of the local public channels here. Barry sanders would have had a ball with rugby

      MMC

      Delete
    16. Jonah Lomu is far and away te greatest rugby player in modern history.

      Unfortunately, rugby is a sport for carousing college kids and people from the southwestern hemisphere.

      Delete
    17. You're kind of forced to play it here when you're young as it's inbedded in the working class culture, so I guess had some fun when I was younger playing it.

      And yes, Sanders would have loved it!

      Delete
    18. We actually had our own version of the game. We called it "kill the man with the football". Non stop action. Modern American football has little momentum flow because of the myriad of things that they stop play for. Such as commercial breaks . And all the bullshlt fouls that they can use to influence the game. Rigged

      MMC

      Delete
    19. Now when sanders was playing there was a kick returner that Detroit had for I bleev a couple seasons. He was a 38 year old guy named Mel Grey. He had as good of lateral motion of Barry and was lighting fast. A real specialist at the art
      He was as exciting as Barry and as dangerous

      Watch this Joe

      http://youtu.be/3jQSHqFrxso

      MMC

      Delete
    20. My word MMC, some of those hits gave me the shivers!

      Delete
    21. I remember Mel Grey. He revolutionized kick off and punt returns and was a blast to watch. He did play for the lions at the end of his career. Devin Hester is pretty darn good and Desmond Howard was not to bad either.
      You're good MMC
      Chuck

      Delete
    22. Photographic recollection is a curse chuck

      MMC

      Delete
    23. I was trying to figure out what you meant by the Packers letting him go MMC. Since you have photographic recollection was this the year the Packers drafted Tony Mandrich from Michigan State first, ( a bust for Green Bay but in later years Tony did Ok for Indianapolis ). I think the running back, forget the name, maybe Charles White from USC was drafted in front of Barry also.

      Chuck

      Delete
    24. I looked it up. Aikman 1 Mandrich 2 Barry Sanders 3 Derrick Thomas 4 Deion Sanders 5. My gosh except for Mandrich all are hall of famers.
      Chuck

      Delete
    25. Trade involved Brian Bozworth. Green Bay had sanders on paper for less than a day. Will try to find more.

      What say the cheeseheads out there?

      MMC

      Delete
    26. Got it now

      Aikman was the first pick by Dallas. Mandrich was picked over sanders by Green Bay. Sanders was then picked by Detroit.

      http://archive.detroitnews.com/article/20140503/SPORTS0101/305030047

      That's how it went down. Now I remember. Everybody here was happy that Green Bay passed over Barry.

      Not so photographic after all I quess

      MMC

      Delete
  7. Nothing yet joe ! Had some incredible sounds but who cares ! 700am out here in the bush , dark! Seen no bf though!
    TTL

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well same as that native video minus the laughing in it

    ReplyDelete
  9. The moose started moving two days ago so they might start showing themselves

    ReplyDelete
  10. It was almost like there were imitating us calling moose in so way at one point and this was at 920 to 945ish sorry there was only one and the sound covered a 4 km radius we would like to call it a wolve but that would be the first wolve in 30 years that never got a reply! Lol

    ReplyDelete
  11. Got to walk into the bush here soon so I'll check on here in a bit given I get signal it's very spotty out here!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Im not so sure about the chocolate face, but I am sure that Joemosexual tugs his "Bigfoot" to the Patty breast jiggle animation loop.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Replies
    1. So you just confirmed that you full of sh*t

      Delete
    2. No... I'm that little pain that won't go away when you're trying to get comfy (spouting hate).

      Delete
    3. I admit it is frustrating trying to educate someone like yourself who refuses to take on board facts. But if we don't try to educate then we are no better than the stubborn believers.

      Delete
    4. Educating? Check out the link... More facts than you could handle son, now that was some schooling;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/is-this-amazing-story-from-late-1800s.html

      Psuedosketicism is a fundamentalist quasi-religion, and I don't believe, I've been convinced son.

      Delete
    5. you just keep on talking to yourself like an insane person- we'll draw our own conclusions (like it says at the top of the page)

      Delete
    6. I'm talking to you son, as much as you want to avoid your drubbing. And you're not here to draw conclusions, you're here to hate... And I'm coming to get ya!

      Delete
    7. I know of no other sane person that exhibits this behavior,
      Do you speak to the dead as well?

      Delete
    8. Are you the one in school that plays up in class for attention and then when the teacher addresses it, you're like;

      "Who me?"

      Delete
    9. no and I do not go to the school on saturday and answer questions when no one is there

      Delete
    10. Are you sure? Cause you did exactly that here son;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/is-this-amazing-story-from-late-1800s.html?m=0

      Delete
    11. hthat's when I discovered you were doing it, as I made pretty clear. How long have you been doing it Joe? It must have started after Dr. Sykes, as you didn't show your smug face around there, which is understandable. Who would, after making such preposterous predictions? That remains the ultimate schooling Joe. It is there for the world to see, until all the servers have been destroyed.

      Delete
    12. ... And Sykes is still accepting samples.

      Must be tough.

      ; )

      Delete
    13. is still accepting samples... like any other lab in the world that gets paid for testing samples.

      Delete
    14. Very, very wrong actually. Labs don't want anything to do with alleged Sasquatch samples... He's even theorising what people are seeing are Neanderthals.

      : p

      Delete
    15. ahahahahahahahh no.

      You don't know a sh*t about what labs do then. Come on, you'll find something like that even in Finding Bigfoot.

      Delete
    16. As a rule, labs won't entertain the idea... Sure, you'll get some run of the mill lab willing to take money from a big budget serious production now and again, but that's it.

      Delete
  14. Wow, the stupid Seattle Seahawks sure don't look like superbowl caliber this year.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "There are over 700 million bigfoots in north america (and that is only in the dimension that we live in)" - Joe F

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. don't provoke him- he might go off on a one of his racist Zana rants and the we'll have Al Sharpton getting squatchy on us

      Delete
    2. JEWsquatches been here for years

      Delete
    3. didnt ISIS take care of them JEWS

      Delete
    4. Zana who is described by a whole community two generations before Bigfoot was populist culture and species traits shared across the world, as having dark, greyish-black skin, bare on the face, but elsewhere she was covered in reddish-black hair. The hair on her head was a bit darker and formed a thick, tousled mane that hung down her back. Her face had a sloping forehead, prominent brows and cheekbones and massive jaws. Her nose was broad and flat, her eyes were reddish and she had large, strong white teeth. Her body was robust and muscular with well-developed breasts. She was tremendously strong, and also swift, able to even outrun a horse. Although she walked and ran upright on two legs, her arms were proportionately long and her toes could be widely splayed, especially the big toes which she could move separately...

      Back up evidence? Kwit's skull. Unusual features of Kwits skull;
      *very wide eye sockets
      *elevated brow ridge
      *extra bone in neck
      *bigger all round
      *bigger teeth
      *bigger jaw bone
      *all this could suggest ancient as opposed to modern human origins

      Delete
    5. Um...no. Dr. Sykes shot your delusional down in flames. Remember? It was on the telly old bean.

      Delete
    6. Cro-Magnon, Otamids... Go check it out son. Let me know if you want some help.

      Delete
    7. Nope. Sub-saharan African. I saw it on the telly.

      So did the rest of the world. Where were you?

      Delete
    8. Where was I? Reading up on Cro-Magnon and Otamids. Let me know if you want some help.

      Delete
    9. googled zana + dr. sykes and the first two entries are from doubtful news.

      looks like you're losing badly

      Delete
    10. check out Joe's dream woman!

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/11/breaking-russian-almasty-zana-was.html

      Delete
    11. Losing? Sykes is still accepting samples and even making statements that he was hoping to find Neanderthal DNA, have a second take son.

      Grow a pair and Google Cro-Magnon & Otamids, let me know if you need any help.

      Delete
    12. Why bother? You're going to cut and paste it about a million times. I won't read it then either, but it saves me a few keystrokes.

      Delete
    13. Grow a pair and Google Cro-Magnon & Otamids, let me know if you need any help.

      Delete
    14. "Frankly, Sharon [S]Hill doesn't know what she's talking about."

      Dr. Meldrum

      Delete
    15. Nope.

      I think I'll watch Capt. Caveman instead. It's just as relevant.

      Delete
  16. thats it? No wonder we havent found any.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The Tooth Fairy...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEZ2Y9liUd8
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdvfEm6B3qE
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBq4mq7YRco

    Plenty found!!!!
    None caught.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lucky people are seeing the tooth fairy everywhere, eh?

      Delete
    2. I thought I saw the tooth fairy once. He looked just like Jeff Meldrum, and he was taking money out of my piggy bank, which was weird

      Delete
    3. sometimes GRAYs looking like Fairies, so you seeing a GRAY but you thinking thats a Fairy

      Delete
    4. A man has the right to feed his family off the pioneering work he's accomplished.

      Delete
    5. Like John Greene? Isn't he in jail for 'feeding his family'?

      Delete
    6. This people are not much different than Rick Dyer. They just have much smaller testicles.

      Delete
  18. Yep, and I even applied Occams Razor to the tooth fairy and it sticks, therefore the Tooth Fairy is real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Professional sighting = tracks = hair = Occam's Razor

      Delete
    2. bleebers getting totally pwned on the BFF. why don't you help them out joe? or you don't want to play unless you get to be king? you're a big stupid fish in a small ridiculous pond. but hey, since you can't get a girlfriend

      Delete
    3. I take apart all of the BFF attacks on here one by one as you copy and paste them, why do I want to go anywhere else where I get make you cry in the process?

      Delete
    4. But nobody pays attention here, other than a handful of homosexual sycophants. Why not go where others that think like you do congregate?

      Delete
    5. Actually, I think you pay attention well enough son, why would you be pleading for my removal like a cry baby? And it's either me drubbing you or you posting hate and lies; no brainer.

      Delete
    6. Not at all. The funniest comments on this site are those that point out your obsessiveness, your delusions, your complete flakery. Sray as long as you wish.

      There are a half dozen comments on this thread alone that made me LOL.

      Thanks Joe!

      Delete
    7. Actions speak louder & all that... Hate campaign says you're kidding no one cry baby.

      I got you good.

      : p

      Delete
    8. Comedy gold! It's like a 24 hour beef jerky commercial.

      Delete
    9. You're the one reeled in like a t*rd son.

      ; )

      Delete
    10. You enjoy reeling them in? We'll add that to your list of personality defects.

      Delete
    11. It's just so easy... Nothing more satisfying than someone adamant he's doing anything but getting reeled in like the giant siolen he is, and getting schooled in the process.

      You = my pocket = well and truly.

      Delete
  19. GRAYs making clones could be some DNA splatter so maybe a son that you never knew

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe, waiting for your email response?? :-)

      Delete
    2. Hello my friend!! I was VERY impressed and learnt a lot!! Expect an email later on today!!

      Delete
    3. Super! I sent Chuck all the stuff also.

      Delete
    4. Also my 7 encounters write up, is now on our site.

      Delete
  20. The trade involved Brian Bozworth. Green Bay had him on paper for less than a day. Any cheeseheads remember this? Would appreciate your help

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
  21. I see a website with stupid written all over it.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Oh my god you are all idiots, there is no way that could be a Bigfoot, it clearly is the elusive Ewok.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh Thank God! I was going to say something but ws afraid of being professionally ostracized.

      Rodeo clowns can be pretty ruthless.

      Delete
    2. GOD he still around -
      or is he still on hiatus

      Delete
  23. Gulf Coast Bigfoot Organization (GCBRO) gots lots of firepower to GITS da JOB DONE

    ReplyDelete
  24. Here the difference- Joe spends hours researching and cutting and pasting. BJ just threatens to strangle people's pets.

    Same result.

    ReplyDelete
  25. pretty sure Joemosexual chokes his own chicken, so I think that arguement is irrelevant.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 182 comments by two or three, too bad. Won't hang around to figure it out.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Nothing going on today joe!!

    TTL!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Dat Ketchum be a fine azz chicken head........I put dat in my stable foshizzle!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. isn't there a law against stupid ppl like you??

      Delete
  29. Dem dar alest 5-10 bigfeets in dat picktur Joey seesem fur sur!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story