Is Patty Carrying a Baby?
Damn. M.K. Davis has outdone himself this time. This enhancement is the most unique and it truly shows what people can come up with when they stare at something for too long. What is in Patty's left hand? A path of fur? A Baby Bigfoot perhaps? One commenter thinks there's a baby Bigfoot in there somewhere: "At 3:28, you can CLEARLY see (thank you MK) a baby (newborn/) holding on to the hair under her chin on the right - its head is tucked under her chin on the left. It is revealed by the highlights. What she's carrying in her left hand, I don't know. This is pure speculation, mind you: What if she'd had twins and the second child didn't make it, and she was washing it when they interrupted her. And that's part of the second baby. Like I said, just speculation...."
Hi Guys,
ReplyDeleteMy name is F. Jones. Earlier tonight I was luck enough to speak to the esteemed researcher John Jones Spoke. He was very patient and helped me vocalize what had been trapped inside for so long. For years I have felt helpless with fear due to my encounter. Its hard to find someone to talk too, and John has really been amazingly patient. I am glad I made a friend out of it, and hopefully we will talk again soon. I just wanted to let others know how great John really is, as a person and as a researcher. He spoke highly of a few people on this site, in particular the guy who used to post as Joe here in the forum. His advice was to email Joe, but he lost Joes email. So I thought I would try again. Joe, could you please send me your email, I think you will be very interested in my encounter. Thanks guys
F. Jones
Hello F Jones,
DeleteAs a believer myself i would love to hear about your encounter and rest assured there no place better than here to share it xx
Yes F. Jones, John W. Jones Spoke, is one of the nicest people you will ever meet.
DeleteQuestion 'Are you two related"? I mean with the same last name and all ?
Cathy Curosious
What "TARD" has been writing these lead-ins?????????????????
DeleteSounds like Lindsay the Idiot!
You might want to ask Joerg (joe/lktomi). He is a regular follower of Lindsay. He will know.
DeleteSykes.........nothing. Munns...........nothing. Meldrum.........nothing. Mulls...........nothing Igor........nothing. Patterson and Gimlin........nothing.
DeleteBlevins...........Destroyed all of the above with his suit. A homemade suit to boot.
Still denying the facts huh Joerg. Your afraid of Don and Dan, just as you are a tube of toothpaste. You Digg
Hey Dipshit, you told us Joe was Black?
DeleteThen you told us he was fat?
Now you say Joe it's this guy Jeorg? And who cares?
But the point is--------
1. your obsessed!
2. you have no idea what you are talking about!
3. your an IDIOT! a SOCK-PUPPET or BOTH!
HA HA HA HA
Who cares if Joerg is black you racist TK? And please stop making fun of Joerg's name -- I understand that he is quite sensitive about it.
DeleteIts Joerg, Leon. Spell it correctly. And I have never claimed joe was black or fat. Thee is more than one troll around you know. I imagine he probably is fat though.
DeleteIt's There,not Thee 8:49. Spell it correctly.
DeleteHa ha ha ha ---------- Your a F'n Dipshit 8:49.
DeleteThank you 8:56.
Hey illiterate moron, it's "you're" -- a contraction of "you are."
DeleteF. Jones is not related to john W. jones. He just one of many sick trolls on here. He is just jealous of John, and wants to be like him, when he grows up, but he can't.
DeleteEva, If you would like to hear from John W. Jones, just ask any question you may have on this site, and I will forward it to John.
DeleteMr. Frank Evans
On another post recently, a troll made light of John W. Jones comment on "Sky Burials'.
DeleteJohn does not believe, nor has any evidence to believe, that these creatures place their dead high up in Spruce/Pine trees.
John was just commenting that 'According to Native Americans' they do place their dead high up in Spruce/Pine trees. Several Elders of the Mohawk tribe have said they seen this, as they found them on steep rocky cliffs secured with Grape vines.
John, and his team went to this location, but after CJ (Mohawk son of Joey P. Johns, brother-in-law) broke his wrist on the steep rocky cliffs.
What John, and his team do believe, is that these creatures spend a lot of their time up in Pine/Spruce trees. He never hears this from other researchers. most researchers admit, they never look up. When searching, they always look at the grounds ahead of them, but seldom look up.
On one of his expeditions, John and his team chased (or tried to chase) a family of them (Apx4) jumping through the tree tops.
This is why many researchers seldom see them, as "They're up in the trees"!
Mr. Frank Evans
http://bigfootbooksblog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/leroy-blevins-unfinished-aborted.html?m=1
DeleteBlevins took a most ten years to make that. Blevins' recreation hasn't the same muscle tone & hair texture and skin folds. Plus, the pictures you see the Blevins suit have had the width reduced by 5%. If we can only just make something a little close to Patty now... Then there's simply no way a Rookie film maker could have made a suit that good back then. If anything; Blevins' suit has helped to strengthen the claim that Patty is real, hominid flesh and blood. Blevins also used materials not available to Roger in 67, and it merely fuels my argument more than yours in the end, so I must thank you for that really.
The only "nothing" is between those perversely creepy ears of yours.
I'm sorry Joerg, I've read your post several times and, after wading through the gross misspellings and awful syntax, I still cannot make any sense out of it -- could you please go through and proofread it and repost it?
DeleteI tell you what, go and get an adult for some help... God knows you need one when you get your arguments bounced off the walls like a true chump.
Delete: p
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThat was really uncalled for D Dover, I don't like homophobia, and don't appreciate your insinuations. Im glad you deleted it, as it was offensive to me and many others.
DeleteF. Jones
Liar, it was a comment about the MK Davis video, nothing else.
DeleteAfter watching the video more I changed my mind on what I wrote about it; so, I deleted it. And here you play your games that I said something else.
DeleteIm sorry but that is a lie Dover. You wrote a very derogatory term that I prefer not to mention. Just because I believe in bigfoot, you call me names. Very very shady.
DeleteDon: "Winston, I really enjoyed working with you on that thread earlier...we really went after DS, didn't we?" W: "Yeah but D Dover and his dingle....." Don: " yes yes, covered Butt-cheeks, I know, look let's forget about all that for the moment, I bought us a nice box of wine and ......" W: " Mom says I can't drink on my medicine....good thing I'm N O T taking it ". Don: " look I like the way you operate, and you type so much like my ex, Daniel, even using" PJ" when referring to Iktomi as "Joe". W: " thanks, it doesn't make you frustrated that most of my points aren't even close to being funny or informative ?..." Don: "shhhhhhh.....look, as far as I'm concerned Winston, I'm thirsty and you're my Little Sweet, with a Diet Dr Pepper and a cupcake !" W: "Awwwwww, thanks Don, let's finish off this box of wine snd see where the night takes us.." Don: "Yes, we shall, because Trolling, much like love, isn't hindered by things like IQ, and "because the night belongs to lovers, because the night, belongs to us...."
DeleteHas anyone ever told you that you are a comedy genius Mike? That well thought out paragraph above, is the funniest thing ive ever heard. You are such a comedic genius!
DeleteHas anyone ever told you that you are a comedy genius? No?? Well I think we've got to the root of why you're so pathetically sore.
DeleteSorry chump, you're as funny as aids.
What's the banned word? Aids?
DeleteHows it swinging Joerg?
DeleteApparently, Joerg thinks it's funny to joke about a deadly disease that has tragically affected millions of good people. Shame on you Joerg!
DeleteIt was a disgusting remark. And slightly racist as well.
DeleteLike I said... You're as funny as aids.
Delete10 feet behind me is as clear a photo of Patty as has been produced. Right hand behind her, left in front and turned 45 degrees with a clear view of the shoulders. There is no baby.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Agreed
DeleteHello Chuck,as much as i would love MK to be on to something here i think your right,i think some of the things we are seeing might just be anomalies in the film but i know nothing about film so i could be wrong xx
DeleteI'm not quite sure what to think. At first I wrote that maybe it was a shadow caused by the the sun reflecting off of the white sand or water, but I deleted that comment because I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it.
DeleteI agree Dover. Have you ever viewed MK's bluff creek massacre breakdown?
DeleteUno!
.. I think it is a Prospector's Gold Pan that she found by the creek .. that she drops at some point ..
DeleteI think its a plastic bag that she is going to tie up in a tree
DeleteWell that would make sense if the bag was blue.
DeleteI heard through the grapevine that Joerg collects blue bags specifically for this purpose.
DeleteBen
DeleteI think they interrupted her Frisbee golf game.
Delete<B-(/)
hey MJA ! and co.
Skunkey, does MJA sill pos here?
DeleteHe's Mia I should say ? and how the hell are you ? I was just having a flashback of the less brutal daze here !
DeleteHey skunky!!
DeleteI'm not sure uno! if I've seen that or not. I've watched a lot of MK Davis' stuff. If it's about the Paiutes killing the red haired giants I've written about that and referenced MK Davis.
Deletehttp://sasquatchresearchers.org/blogs/bigfootjunction/2015/01/19/paiutes-battle-red-haired-giants-at-lovelock-cave/
If anything it's a rock
ReplyDeleteSITE TROLL, SITE TROLL
ReplyDeleteWHAT YOU GONNA DO,
WHAT YOU GONNA DO,
WHEN WE COME FOR YOU.
SITE TROLL, SITE TROLL
WHATCHA GONNA DO
WHEN WE COME FOR YOU
a baby bigfoot ??? you're shittin' me again right? cheesus
ReplyDeleteSo are we looking here at fantastic revelations of paranoid schizophrenic, or at just the continued need of a former attention whore?
ReplyDeleteMK has some glaring inconsistencies in his analysis. Unfortunately, MK has a history of contrast manipulating the Patterson film, in order to bring out alleged objects that were never there to begin with. Contrast manipulation is evidence contamination.
In the above reanalysis, he takes frame 352 from the middle of his new video sequence that shows the contrast manipulated left palm of Patty, and he points out that there is no longer a white object, but now it has become brown. That inconsistency in itself would cause an ordinary person to pause. But not MK. He explains it off as Patty tearing off a block of hair from the contrast manipulated white object. And in his mind, Patty did it not only with one hand, but she did it in that fraction of a second where it was hidden from view. Whew! Now you try holding any white object in your left hand, and without any jerky motions or the use of an opposing force that most people would say is required to produce tearing, tear off a piece in such a manner that it now becomes brown. You failed? Go ahead, try again. Obviously, I am just toying with you in order to demonstrate an impossibility. But this is an important impossibility because MK Davis, the former Patterson film expert, cannot grasp that this feat is an impossibility. Just like all of his other hoaxes, he has never admitted that he was wrong about any of them. Of course, since he also once claimed that Patty had a stick in her left hand, and now she supposedly has a white object, MK cannot have is both ways. He just made a liar out of himself.
When Patty's hand swings forward, we most likely see her brown thumb, as the now furry object. From the top or side, her hand and fingers appear brown from her brown hair. From the bottom, the wear surfaces appear to be a tan color. But if you use contrast manipulation, you can magically turn the tan, INTO WHITE. Voila! But you cannot then turn the white into dark brown. So MK painted himself into a corner and had to concoct an elaborate explanation that does not follow the ordinary rules of common sense, in order to explain the now brown color of his alleged white foreign object.
MK naturally failed to explain that the Frame 352 still shot, came out of the middle of his sequence, since the alleged brown furry object that Patty allegedly tore off, then magically turns back to white again and is no longer torn off of anything. He failed to point that out because he ran out of explanations that lacked common sense. White to brown and then back to white again, is enough to cause even a 5th grader to gag.
In conclusion, upon close examination of the above analysis, we can see that there is contrast manipulation coupled with multiple inconsistencies, that are rationalized off with an impossible sequence of events to have occurred, that are then misrepresented using trickery.
It looks like MK at least has not lost his touch for evidence contamination. He must be trying to stay in practice for him to have produced yet another video that proves absolutely nothing.
MK is getting ready to reveal a huge upset in the community. People are saying that Davis is gonna blow the lid off of the biggest hoax of all time.
DeleteJoerg, Bookerson, and Leon can hardly wait for the big news to be revealed.
DeletePeople or just another paid skeptic bullshite rumor that you are trying to start? Big difference.
DeleteBrrrrrrr... I'm sure people are shivering in their boots.
DeleteSo the guy who has built his reputation on the PG film (and even insinuated murder) is going to do a 180? I don't think so.
DeleteThese are the delusions these people follow, yes.
Delete(Shudder)
M.K. Davis isn't knitting with two needles.
ReplyDelete